The wall chart

Which theorem blocks each route

The programme's founding question, answered as a landscape. Every superluminal route is blocked by a theorem we recomputed independently; two doors remain open but only beyond standard physics; and the slow ship is an engineering problem.

BLOCKED Alcubierre bubble, thin wall

The founding construction. Recomputing the energy from the metric gives a scaling law |E| ∝ v²R²/d, and about 188 solar masses of negative energy for a 100-metre bubble at light speed with a millimetre wall. The quantum inequality then forces the wall thinner than 10⁻³³ metres, and the requirement rises to roughly 10²⁰ galaxy masses.

Margin: ≈10⁷⁰× a stellar mass Deciding claims: C-0005 (green), C-0007 (green), C-0008 (green)
BLOCKED Van Den Broeck volume trick

A geometric modification hides a macroscopic pocket behind a microscopic bubble, cutting the energy by 32 orders of magnitude — a result we independently reproduced from the paper's own stated profile. But the bubble wall's stress-energy is Hawking-Ellis Type IV: it has no rest frame, so there is no observer for whom its energy density is even defined, let alone positive. We confirmed this by direct computation.

Margin: amount solved; obstruction absolute Deciding claims: C-0020 (draft), C-0018 (green)
BLOCKED Positive-energy solitons (Lentz, Fell-Heisenberg)

Several proposals claim warp geometries sourced by purely positive energy. Each proves positivity only for one family of observers (the co-moving Eulerian frame); a sufficiently fast but still sub-light observer sees negative density. The rebuttal in the corpus shows this explicitly, and the Fell-Heisenberg text itself concedes the weak energy condition is violated in compact regions.

Margin: weak energy condition unmet for all observers Deciding claims: C-0021 (draft), C-0023 (draft)
SUBLUMINAL Bobrick-Martire / constant-velocity shell

A genuinely positive-energy warp shell — but explicitly sub-light, described by its own authors as a shell of matter that 'requires propulsion'. It is a rocket in geometric dress, not a faster-than-light route.

Margin: subluminal by construction Deciding claims: C-0023 (draft)
OPEN Modified gravity (Conformal Gravity)

In Conformal Gravity — a fourth-order alternative to Einstein's theory — the Alcubierre metric with a particular shape function has non-negative energy density, needing no exotic matter. Two caveats keep it open rather than solved: Conformal Gravity is a speculative theory, not accepted physics; and the positivity shown is again the single-observer density, with the dominant energy condition conceded to be violated. We verified the setup is non-degenerate (the metric is not conformally flat); reproducing the full sign needs the fourth-order Bach tensor, which is scheduled.

Margin: open — conditional on non-GR physics Deciding claims: C-0026 (draft)
OPEN Break the quantum inequality (non-minimal coupling)

The quantum inequality that forbids the thick wall is derived for a free, minimally-coupled scalar field. A non-minimally-coupled field has stress-energy that can violate the null energy condition, and no such bound exists for some averaging schemes. This is a specific, named place an escape could live — but nobody in the corpus has shown it actually delivers, and it is not yet priced against the 20-order-of-magnitude gap.

Margin: unquantified Deciding claims: C-0024 (draft), C-0025 (draft)
OPEN Subluminal cruise (0.2c)

No theorem blocks a slow ship. A 4-person round trip to Alpha Centauri at 0.2c takes 43.9 years; the crew ages 43.1. The obstacle is the rocket equation — carried fuel ranges from a million kilograms (ideal antimatter) to 10¹⁵ kg (fusion with only charged products usable), because two-body kinematics puts 80% of fusion's yield into a neutral neutron no nozzle can direct.

Margin: engineering, not physics Deciding claims: C-0014 (green)